|
Taking the Right Tax Course
Option A:
CORRECT. In South Euclid/Lyndhurst Board of Education v. Cuyahoga
County Board of Revision; C.I.A. Properties, 74 Ohio St.3d 314,
658 N.E.2d 750 (1996), the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the decision
of the tax board and found the value of the property was the amount
as appraised by the education board’s expert, not the purchase price
paid in the sale and leaseback agreement. The expert took many
factors such as sales price and the auditor’s value as well as current
and future use and market rates in determining the appraised value.
Back to the Facts
|