|
Whose Cost Is It?
By Joel
H. Mirman, Esq.
A New York Federal District Court recently
issued a decision challenging what had been considered to be the
“Gold Standard” regarding who pays the high cost of responding
to discovery requests requiring expensive production of electronically
stored data.
In Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, 2003 WL
21087884 (S.D.N.Y. May 13, 2003), the Plaintiff requested that
the Defendant produce "[a]ll documents concerning any communication
by or between UBS employees concerning Plaintiff." The Plaintiff
knew that additional responsive e-mail existed that the Defendant
had failed to produce. She requested that the Defendant
produce the e-mail from archival media. Claiming undue burden
and expense, the Defendant urged the court to shift the cost of
production to the Plaintiff, citing the Rowe Entertainment,
Inc. v. The William Morris Agency, 205 F.R.D. 421 (S.D.N.Y.
2002) decision.
The court noted that the application of the
Rowe factors may result in disproportionate cost shifting away
from large defendants, and the court modified the test (adding
two factors, combining two and removing one) to seven factors:
1. The extent to which the request is
specifically tailored to discover
----- relevant information;
2. The availability of such information
from other sources;
3. The total cost of production compared
to the amount in controversy;
4. The total cost of production compared
to the resources available to
----- each party;
5. The relative ability of each party
to control costs and its incentive to do so;
6. The importance of the issue at stake
in the litigation and;
7. The relative benefits to the parties
of obtaining the information.
The court listed the factors in descending
order of importance, stating that they should not all be weighted
equally. Applying the new test, the court ordered the Defendant
to produce, at its own expense, all responsive e-mail existing
on its optical disks, active servers, and five backup tapes as
selected by the Plaintiff. The court determined that only
after the contents of the backup tapes are reviewed and the Defendant's
costs are quantified will the court conduct the appropriate cost-shifting
analysis.
Companies should consider re-evaluating how
they store their data in order to minimize production costs in
the event they are confronted with such requests.
Joel
Mirman is a Shareholder
and a member of the Litigation Practice Group. He can be
contacted at jmirman@bdblaw.com
or 614.227.4264.
Recording Fees to Double
By Grant
M. Yoakum, Esq.
A portion of Ohio's current budget bill doubles certain
costs associated with real estate documents. House Bill
195 was passed by the Ohio Legislature, and one of the means for
increasing revenues is that effective August 1, 2003, the recording
fees and copy costs will double at all of Ohio's county recorders.
In other words, a two-page deed that previously cost $20 to record
will now be $40. Obviously, the increased cost will have
the most significance for documents containing more pages, such
as a condominium declaration and by-laws or recorded loan documents.
The increased cost for copies will likewise be more significant
for lengthy documents that are not available through another source.
It is not clear at this time whether the individual county recorder,
auditor or fiscal officer will have any discretion in implementing
the higher fees. If you need to record lengthy documents
and can control the timing, you should try to complete the process
early and avoid the August 1, 2003 fee increases.
Grant
Yoakum is an Associate attorney and member of the
Real Estate & Construction Law and Business Law Practice Groups.
He can be contacted at gyoakum@bdblaw.com
or 216.615.7356.
Avoid Outdated and Unachievable
Insurance Requirements
By Kenneth
A. Fisher, Jr., AIA, CSI
Several common errors in construction contracts result
from the use of outdated and unachievable insurance requirements.
While many of these problems go unnoticed or are simply ignored
in the routine exchange of insurance certificates, some of the
errors could lead to expensive consequences.
The most persistent error involves the specification
of commercial general liability coverage. Although the name
was changed to “commercial general liability” over 20 years
ago, many contracts still refer to “comprehensive general
liability” insurance. Even older names that occasionally
appear include public liability insurance, manufacturers and contractors
liability insurance, and contractual liability insurance.
Similarly, business auto liability insurance is often
incorrectly called “comprehensive automobile liability.”
And rather than a “combined single” limit, the proper way to specify
limits on business auto coverage is through an “each accident”
limit.
A more serious problem concerns builder’s risk insurance.
The AIA’s A201-1997, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction,
for example, requires “property insurance written on a builder’s
risk ‘all-risk’ or equivalent policy form.” Builder’s risk
policies, however, typically exclude various perils which would
be included in a true “all risk” form.
The gap between requirements and available coverage
also extends to the A201’s waiver of subrogation. That waiver
explicitly includes “the Architect [and the] Architect’s consultants.”
Most builder’s risk insurers, however, will not agree to waive
subrogation against design professionals.
The solution to the builder’s risk problems is to strike
the unachievable requirements and describe the particular policy
that the owner intends to purchase or specify that the owner will
purchase “commercially available” coverage.
Misnomers and unachievable requirements also plague
additional-insured requirements. The terms “additional named
insured,” “named insured,” and “coinsured” are no longer used.
The current term is “additional insured.” Two commonly specified
but unachievable requirements are mandating additional insureds
on a builder’s risk policy or that a person be named as an additional
insured on a professional liability policy although the person
is not a member of the associated profession.
Kenneth
Fisher is an Associate attorney and a member
of the Real Estate & Construction and Litigation Practice
Groups. He can be contacted at kfisher@bdblaw.comor
614.227.4290.
Buckingham to
Serve as Counsel for Insureds of Chubb Insurance Company
Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs is pleased to
announce that Chubb Insurance Company has approved Buckingham
to serve as counsel for its insureds. Chubb is especially
strong in areas such as directors and officers liability insurance
(in profit and nonprofit areas), employment insurance and other
niche risks. If you are currently insured with Chubb, and
wish to have a Buckingham attorney represent your Company, your
nonprofit or you as an individual, you need only request that
your broker include a rider specifying defense work by Buckingham.
Chubb has agreed to honor these requests. If you have any
questions, you can contact Gerald B. Chattman, Managing Partner
of Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP, Cleveland.
Gerald
Chattman is a Shareholder and member of the Employment
Law Practice Group. He can be contacted at gchattman@bdblaw.com
or 216.615.7354.
Practice Group Profile Featuring Donald B. Leach, Jr., Esq.
Donald
B. Leach, Jr. is Managing Partner of the Columbus office
of Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and currently serves
as Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of the Firm’s Board
of Managers. A graduate of Union College, Schenectady, New
York, Don earned his Juris Doctorate from The Ohio State University
College of Law. He has a Martindale-Hubbell rating of AV,
which indicates very high to pre-eminent legal ability and very
high ethical standards, and is listed in the 2003-2004 edition
of The Best Lawyers in America® and the 2002-2003 edition
of Chambers Global – The World’s Leading Lawyers.
He is a recipient of the Columbus Bar Association Community
Service Award and is a member of the Million Dollar Advocates
Forum.
This year Don received a unique honor: He is
the 49th recipient of the Cornerstone Award from the
Builders Exchange of Central Ohio – the first attorney to be so
honored. The Builders Exchange is a 110-year-old, 1300-member
commercial construction trade association based in Columbus.
Don was the first practicing attorney to ever be elected to the
organization’s Board of Directors and to serve as its President.
He has spearheaded the participation of Buckingham, Doolittle
& Burroughs in the Builders Exchange, taught many of its educational
programs, and was involved in the creation of a number of BX programs,
including its Idea Exchange and the Law Group. During Don’s
term as President, the Builders Exchange adopted a strategic plan
that is still an integral part of its success.
“The Cornerstone Award is a great honor,” says Don.
“It recognizes the volunteer hours I have devoted to the Builders
Exchange and to the industry. I earn my livelihood from
this industry, and I believe that it is appropriate for me to
give back, to give time to improve the way things happen in construction.
Through the Builders Exchange, I have been able to facilitate
communication and organize efforts that have benefited many different
members of the construction industry.”
Don values the role of Builders Exchange in fostering
communication and cooperation. “Both the legal profession and
the construction industry are experiencing changes due to technology
as well as time and money pressures. But both still boil
down to relationships. The Builders Exchange is a terrific
resource for the central Ohio construction industry – it’s a forum
for people to work and meet in a non-competitive environment.
“A spin-off benefit of my involvement in the Builders
Exchange has been that I have been able to provide an added service
to clients because I have had the chance to meet so many of those
who are involved in the construction industry,” Don continues.
“This enables me to provide service beyond the expected because
I can know who to contact when an issue comes up so that it can
be addressed. This gives me the chance to do what I really
love – solve problems.”
In any construction project, Don focuses on both the
details of a construction project and the “big picture” of what
his client needs to achieve. He starts by helping his client
develop appropriate relationships with the wide range of people
and businesses providing the services needed to complete the project.
During the contracting process he helps his client define the
risks involved and clarify how they will be handled and who will
be responsible for each.
As the construction progresses, Don explains, “Issues
will arise. It’s impossible to anticipate everything that
may come up. I will then work to help resolve any problems.
I have found that it is crucial to address the issues as they
arise and not let them fester. At the end, I work with my
client to clean up loose ends and unresolved issues – and then
to celebrate the successful result!”
A lifelong resident of the Columbus area, Don has served
as treasurer for a number of Columbus Public Schools levy and
bond-issue campaigns and is active in a number of community organizations,
including the Upper Arlington Parks and Recreation Advisory Board,
the Upper Arlington Civic Association, The Rotary Club of Columbus
and the YMCA Youth in Government Program. Don’s commitment
to the welfare of the construction trade and the legal profession
is illustrated by leadership positions he has held for the Construction
Law Committee and the Real Property Institute of the Columbus
Bar Association. He is also a member of the Government,
Education & Construction Law Committee of the Ohio State Bar
Association.
Don is proud – and relieved – to have survived five
years of service coaching his daughter Anna’s elementary soccer
team and is currently wondering why he allowed himself to be elected
President of the parent organization for his daughter Gwen’s high
school rowing team. Joking aside, though, he is grateful
for tremendous support and balance in his life provided by his
wonderful wife Jane, who has just resumed her career as an elementary
school principal with the Columbus Public Schools, and his active,
involved teenaged daughters.
Don
Leach is a Shareholder and member of the Real Estate
& Construction Law and Business Law Practice Groups.
He can be contacted at dleach@bdblaw.com
or 614.227.4262.
The attorneys of Buckingham, Doolittle
& Burroughs are committed to providing you with timely legal
news that is helpful to you and your business. Please
take a moment to answer a few questions about our newsletter so
we may continue to send you the news you want to read about.
To complete the survey on line go to: http://www.bdblaw.com/newpublications3.asp or
click here for a printer
friendly version, complete and fax to 330.252.5473 Attn:
Lorna Henderson
Out and About – Recent Presentations:
Robert
A. Hager, John
P. Slagter (Buckingham ClevelandSM),
and David
W. Woodburn (Buckingham AkronSM)
were presenters at the Buckingham Annual Real Estate &
Construction Law Seminar held in Akron, Ohio. Their topics
were “Fairness in Contracting Act: ‘Level the Playing
Field,’” “Legal Strategies for Real Property Tax,” and “Case
Law Update.”
RobertA.
Hager(Buckingham ClevelandSM)
presented “Litigation of Liens” at the Ohio State Bar
Association sponsored seminar titled “Real Estate Litigation”
in Cleveland, Ohio.
Donald
B. Leach, Jr. (Buckingham ColumbusSM)presented
“Liens and Encumbrances Affecting Real Estate” on
behalf of the Ohio State Bar Association Continuing Legal Education
Institute in Columbus, Ohio. He also spoke on “The How’s
and Why’s of Paperwork” at the Ohio’s Mechanics’ Lien Law
Seminar sponsored by The Builders Exchange of Central Ohio.
CraigB.
Paynter(Buckingham ColumbusSM)
gave a presentation titled “Litigation of Liens” at
the Ohio State Bar Association Seminar in Columbus, Ohio.
John
P. Slagter(Buckingham ClevelandSM)spoke
at “Boundary Law in Ohio,” sponsored by the National Business
Institute. His topics were “Water Boundaries, Ethics,
and Handling Right-of-Way Problems.”
William
G. Williams(Buckingham CantonSM)
organized and moderated the Stark County Bar Association sponsored
seminar titled “Stark County Government’s Involvement in Real
Estate Transactions” held in Canton, Ohio.
If you are interested in obtaining information on upcoming seminars
or would be interested in having speakers from Buckingham, Doolittle
& Burroughs, LLP make a presentation to your organization,
please contact: Lorna Henderson, Sr. Marketing Coordinator, at
lhenderson@bdblaw.com
or 800.686.2825 ext. 473.
|