|
November 2001 Vol. 10, Issue 3
Grab The Brass Ring: A Financial Plan that Meets Your Goals Do you remember trying to grab the brass ring on an old-fashioned merry-go-round as it rotated while your horse bobbed up and down to the sound of joyful music? Those were the "good old days." You had your whole future to look forward to, and you probably wondered what you would be doing when you were as old as your parents - or even your grandparents. Today most of the merry-go-rounds have vanished (and fortunate you would be if you possessed one of the wooden animals), but the opportunity to grab the brass ring still exists - and you should do so before it's too late. By "brass ring" I mean a financial plan for your future. You should set out your goals, and then formulate and implement plans to meet them. You might even set your sights on some apparently unattainable goals because as Robert Browning wrote, "A man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a heaven for?" Next, prioritize your goals and develop a specific plan for achieving each one. That way, the failure to meet one objective won't adversely affect the achievement of another. Clarifying Your Goals To implement these objectives, select investment vehicles (for example, stocks, bonds, treasury bills and notes, certificates of deposit, and life insurance), preferably with the assistance of someone knowledgeable in this field. Match the investment vehicles with each goal, considering its priority in your ranking. Remember that the higher the priority of your goal, the less risk you can afford, and the lower the rate of return you should be willing to accept. Many people turn this analysis upside down, taking more risks (with the expectation of greater returns) to meet high-priority goals, while accepting less risk (and lower returns) to meet low-priority goals. Financial planners almost always recommend that you diversify your investment portfolio to spread the risks of losses in particular investments or areas of investment. While this is generally sound advice, you should also be aware that diversification can get in the way of meeting your goals, since a low-priority goal might require taking a greater risk than would result from diversification of assets. The older the person, the more his or her thoughts turn to fixed-income investments, such as taxable and nontaxable bonds, certificates of deposit and money market funds. While these may be "safe" as far as comparative risk is concerned, their returns will be eroded by inflation over the years. As a result, there may not be enough income and principal to meet future living expenses, etc. Therefore, it may be well to provide for some element of growth in the value of the portfolio, through stocks, so that there will be sufficient funds in the future. Income taxes, both present and projected (if one is capable of projecting what Congress will do in the future), should be considered in any investment decision. Of great importance, also, is planning for the disposition of your assets during life and at death. You will need the advice of a qualified attorney to inform you about wills and trusts and other devices that provide for the orderly transfer of your assets, with maximum preservation of wealth and minimum impact of federal and state estate and gift taxes. So, if you have not already done so, get going! Go for the brass ring. Today is a good time to begin. George Weinstein, Esq. is a member of the Trust & Estates Practice Group in Boca Raton, Florida and can be reached by email at gweinstein@bdblaw.com or at 561.995.2981. Section 529 College Savings Plans Last October, the Ohio Tuition Trust Authority launched the College Advantage Savings Plan, which is also called a "Section 529" qualified tuition plan. There are five separate funds available under the Ohio plan. The first, Guaranteed Savings Fund, was formerly known as the Ohio Prepaid Tuition Program. The other four funds, known collectively as the Variable Investment Funds, are new to Ohio. Under the Guaranteed Savings plan, contributions buy units of tomorrow's tuition at today's prices. The fund keeps pace with tuition inflation at Ohio's four-year public universities. Thus, five credit hours purchased today can be "cashed in" fifteen years from now for five credit hours, regardless of how much those credits cost at that time. Under the Variable Investment Funds programs, money is invested in portfolios made up of diverse types of funds. The investment portfolios are managed by a private investment company hired by the state. Any Ohio resident can set up an account for any other person, whether or not the beneficiary lives in Ohio and whether or not the beneficiary goes to an Ohio educational institution. A resident of another state can establish an Ohio account if the beneficiary lives in Ohio. Although at least one of the parties must live in Ohio when the plan is established, it does not matter whether either or both parties continue to reside in Ohio after the account is set up. Section 529 Plans offer various tax planning advantages, including certain deductions from Ohio taxes and flexibility in terms of meeting the $10,000 annual exclusion amount for federal gift tax purposes. Additionally, there are no federal or state income taxes on contributions while the money remains in the account. And if withdrawals are used for educational expenses, the income earned on contributions is never taxed. However, if withdrawn funds are used for other reasons, there is a 10% tax penalty. For more information, contact the Ohio Tuition Trust Authority at 1-800-233-6734
or visit www.collegeadvantage.com. Phylip J. Divine, Esq. is a member of the Trust & Estates Practice Group and can be reached by email at pdivine@bdblaw.com or at 330.258.6456. Bennett v. Stanley: Landowners' Exposure to Liability for Injuries by Trespassing Children By David W. Hilkert,
Esq. and Michael R. Shanabruch,
Esq.
However, the Ohio Supreme Court recently held that a landowner who maintains an attractive nuisance on his property is required to exercise ordinary care to protect children who trespass from foreseeable and unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm. In Bennett v. Stanley (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 35, a five-year-old boy died when he fell into his neighbors' swimming pool. The pool, which had not been used in several years, was essentially a stagnant pond in which tadpoles, frogs, and snakes were found. The pool was neither surrounded by a fence nor covered by a tarp. Moreover, the pool contained no ladders and its sides were slippery due to an accumulation of algae. The child apparently had been looking at the frogs when he fell in. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court held that the landowner could be found liable for the death of the child according to the attractive nuisance doctrine. Under the attractive nuisance doctrine, "a possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm to children trespassing thereon caused by an artificial condition upon the land if: 1. The place where the condition exists is one upon which the possessor knows or has reason to know that children are likely to trespass, and 2. The condition is one of which the possessor knows or has reason to know and which he realizes or should realize will involve an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to such children, and 3. The children because of their youth do not discover the condition or realize the risk involved in intermeddling with it or in coming within the area made dangerous by it, and 4. The utility to the possessor of maintaining the condition and the burden of eliminating the danger are slight as compared with the risk to children involved, and 5. The possessor fails to exercise reasonable care to eliminate the danger or to otherwise protect the children." The Supreme Court explained that this doctrine "harmonizes the competing societal interests of protecting children and preserving property rights." Thus, while it imposes liability upon the landowner for accidents that are reasonably preventable, it does not make the landowner an absolute insurer of the safety of trespassing children. For instance, the doctrine does not apply where the harm is unforeseeable, the dangerous condition is so open and obvious that even a child would appreciate the danger, or the dangerous condition is essential to the landowner's legitimate use of the property. The Supreme Court further held that the landowner could be liable for the death of the child's mother, who died in an unsuccessful rescue attempt. The court explained that while the attractive nuisance doctrine does not ordinarily apply to adults, it may be applied where an adult is injured in an attempt to rescue a child who is imperiled by an artificial condition maintained by the landowner. David W. Hilkert, Esq.,
is a shareholder and a member of the Litigation Practice Group and can
be reached at dhilkert@bdblaw.com
or at 330.258.6521. Michael
R. Shanabruch, Esq., is a member of the Litigation and Real Estate
& Construction Practice Groups and can be reached at mshanabruch@bdblaw.com
or at 216.615.7346. Bret A. Adams, Of Counsel Betsy J. Houchen, Of Counsel Marian Pearlman Nease, Of Counsel Beth A. Nagel, Associate Attorney Anne M. Markowski, Staff Attorney Michael R. Shanabruch, Staff
Attorney New BDB Attorneys
Pass Bar Shila Nalawadi, Associate Attorney Christina M. Royer, Associate
Attorney Save The Date
for these Upcoming Presentations: On January 9, 2002 in Akron, Ohio Patrick J. Keating will be a presenter for the National Business Institute seminar, Advanced Real Estate Law in Ohio. For additional information contact the National Business Institute at 800.930.6182. On February 28, 2002 the Real Estate & Construction Practice Group will be holding their Annual Seminar in Akron, Ohio. Watch for more details in the upcoming issues! Out and About - Recent Presentations: Family Law Practice Group Health Law Practice Group Thomas W. Hess (Columbus, Ohio) spoke at two Ohio Health Care Association Seminars in Cleveland and Columbus, Ohio on Advanced Directives and Employee Criminal Background Checks. Thomas W. Hess also recently provided an overview of Health Law Cases and Regulations and How to Implement a Health Care Corporate Compliance Plan at the Annual AOPHA Convention in Akron, Ohio and at the Healthcare Institute of Cleveland Ohio. Betsy J. Houchen (Columbus, Ohio) spoke on the HIPAA Privacy Regulations for the Ohio Council for Home Care and Lorman Education Seminars. Marian Pearlman Nease (Boca Raton, Florida) gave two presentations at Life Care Services Symposium one on Legal Updates and one on Corporate Compliance Plans. Patrick H. Reymann (Akron, Ohio) facilitated a seminar providing an update on recent Legal Developments in Ohio at the Wadsworth-Rittman Hospital Quarterly Medical Staff Meeting in collaboration with Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Office of Continuing Medical Education. Intellectual Property Practice Group Karen D. Butera was recently part of the board meeting and conference for the Rubber Division of the American Chemical Society. Tax Law Practice Group |
|||||
|
|