June 2001
Vol. 4, Issue 1
(Get a printer-friendly
version)
|
By Grant
M. Yoakum, Esq.
Welcome
to the June issue of Build on This, the Buckingham,
Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP electronic
newsletter for the construction and real estate
industries. Bob Hager and Alan DiGirolamo
have recently seen success in the Summit County
Court of Appeals, representing Kenmore Construction.
The article, "Recovering Economic Losses
Related to Unmarked Underground Utility Lines,"
written by Bob, Alan, and Andrew Perry, helps
clarify Ohio law in this area which could
affect many of you. The second article in
this issue, by Jeannette Knudsen, discusses
the many business uses that contractors are
finding for the Internet. We close the issue
with a profile of one of the attorneys in
the Firms' Real Estate and Construction Law
Practice Group, Ed Buehrle. We hope that you
find the information in this publication useful,
and that you enjoy getting to know one of
us a bit better.
Grant
M. Yoakum, Esq., is a member
of the Real Estate and Construction Law Practice
Group and can be reached at:gyoakum@bdblaw.com
or at 330.258.6431.
|
Recovering
Economic Losses Related To Unmarked Underground
Utility Lines
By: Robert
A. Hager, Esq., Alan
P. DiGirolamo, Esq., Andrew
S. Perry. Esq.
In
a case recently litigated by our firm, the Summit
County Court of Appeals determined that BDB's client,
Kenmore Construction Company, Inc. ("Kenmore")
was entitled to seek economic damages (i.e. loss
of productivity, delay damages) based upon East
Ohio Gas' negligent failure to accurately locate
and mark its underground utility lines at numerous
construction sites.
Ohio
law requires utility companies, like East Ohio,
to locate and mark the locations of their underground
utility lines within 48 hours of receiving notice
from the contractor that construction operations
will begin in the area. After receiving notice from
Kenmore, East Ohio hired Central Locating Services,
Ltd. ("CLS") to mark the location of East
Ohio's underground lines. CLS failed to accurately
mark the lines, including the approximate depth
of the lines at the time of installation. The utility
lines were damaged by Kenmore's excavation equipment.
East Ohio sued Kenmore for the damaged utility lines
and loss of natural gas. Kenmore counterclaimed
to recover economic losses resulting from East Ohio's
negligent failure to accurately mark the lines.
The
Trial Court granted summary judgment for East Ohio
and determined that Ohio law prohibited Kenmore's
recovery of economic losses without a showing of
personal injury or property damage unless there
was an express contract between Kenmore and East
Ohio. This is known as the economic loss doctrine.
There was no evidence of property damage to Kenmore's
property, as the only property damaged was East
Ohio's utility lines. There also was no evidence
of personal injury (i.e. gas inhalation or exploding
gas).
Recoverable Economic Damage
The Summit County Court of Appeals reversed the
Trial Court and determined that under Ohio law,
economic damages are recoverable by Kenmore if it
can demonstrate that a connection exists between
the parties that is sufficient to substitute for
an express contract between them. Kenmore identified
three grounds which show that a sufficient connection
between East Ohio and Kenmore exists. First, Kenmore
argued that Ohio statutory law creates a mandatory
duty for a utility owner such as East Ohio to mark
its underground lines, including the approximate
depth at the time of installation. Second, Kenmore
was a third-party intended beneficiary of the locating
service contract between East Ohio and CLS. Third,
East Ohio exercised direct control and supervision
over third parties, such as CLS, which located its
underground lines. The Court of Appeals held that
these facts established a connection between Kenmore
and East Ohio sufficient to overcome summary judgment.
The case has been remanded to the Trial Court for
a new trial on Kenmore's claims for loss of production
and delay damages against East Ohio Gas. Kenmore
will also be permitted to pursue its claims against
East Ohio Gas for money due on open account.
Robert
A. Hager, Esq., is a member of the
Real Estate and Construction Law Practice Group
and can be reached at:
bhager@bdblaw.com or at 216.615.7318.
Alan P. DiGirolamo, Esq., is a member
of the Real Estate and Construction Law Practice
Group and can be reached at: adigirolamo@bdblaw.com
or at 216.615.7342.
Andrew S. Perry, Esq., is a member of
the Real Estate and Construction Law Practice Group
and can be reached at: aperry@bdblaw.
com or at 330.258-6479.
Internet
Benefits For The Construction Company
By: Jeannette L.
Knudsen, Esq.
Many
construction companies believe that creating a Web
site on the Internet is of no benefit to them because
of the service-oriented nature of the industry.
However, other construction companies have found
that a well-developed site can be very beneficial.
Nowadays, many individuals and companies use the
Internet as a daily business tool to locate information
about products and services and to correspond with
business contacts quickly and efficiently via electronic
mail.
So how can the Internet be beneficial to a construction
company? Consider the following example. A subcontractor
is submitting a bid for a project with a general
contractor with whom the subcontractor has not previously
performed work. If the subcontractor has a well-developed
Web site, the general contractor can use the Internet
to familiarize himself with the subcontractor's
work. A contractor's Web site can include information
on:
- The type of projects completed
- The number of company employees
- Other contractors for whom the company has performed
work
- The company's suppliers
- The company's principals
- The length of time the company has been in business
- The company's location and contact information.
Providing a general contractor with this type of
information could give the company the competitive
edge needed to be awarded the project. Be careful,
however; before hiring a company to develop your
Web site, consult an attorney to ensure that your
legal rights to and ownership of your web site are
protected.
In addition to the benefits of a Web site, many
companies are starting to use the Internet for exchanging
information via electronic means. What could this
change mean for the construction company? The Internet
gives contractors the ability to electronically
exchange various types of documents, including contracts,
contract addenda, change orders, invoices, bids,
requests for additional project information, and
project meeting materials. The electronic exchange
of information and the legal enforceability of electronically
transmitted documents are now supported by the enactment
of the federal Electronic Records and Signatures
in Commerce Act and the Ohio Uniform Electronic
Transactions Act, which in essence give electronically
executed documents that same effect as traditional
paper documents. Be careful, however, to see that
a well-drafted electronic data interchange agreement
is executed by the parties - before agreeing to
exchange any documents electronically. This agreement
will establish rules for exchanging documents and
will provide enforceability for those documents.
Jeannette
L. Knudsen, Esq., is a member of
the Intellectual Property Practice Group and can
be reached at:
jknudsen@bdblaw.com or at 330.643.0350.
Practice
Group Profile - Edward V. Buehrle
Build
On This for this quarter features Edward
V. Buehrle, who has been a member of the
Firm's Real Estate and Construction Practice Group
since 1997, resident in the Akron, Ohio office.
Ed joined us as a result of our merger with Nicholas
T. George & Associates and was elected a Buckingham
shareholder on February 28, 2001.
Ed concentrates his practice on real estate transactions.
He likes this area of the law because transactions
have "a beginning and an end and each deal
is different." He explains, that "identifying
the issues at the earliest possible point translates
into good client service. Part of the challenge
is to try to minimize the surprises and avoid the
last minute fire drills."
The most challenging aspect of real estate transaction
work, Ed believes, is managing expectations. The
attorney needs to do this effectively throughout
the whole process: from meeting deadlines to communicating
events as they occur. At the end of a transaction,
one goal is to have the client feel that value was
received. Although clients certainly appreciate
it when we can help resolve their problems, oftentimes
our value is in helping clients avoid problems.
But, "sometimes it is difficult for clients
to appreciate value related to the problems that
are avoided and never materialize. When we help
clients avoid problems and pitfalls, to some clients,
it's as if the potential risks never existed. So,
it is important for clients, for their own sense
of satisfaction, to appreciate what doesn't happen
as much as for what does happen."
Originally interested in a business career, Ed
enrolled in the joint degree program at the University
of Akron, receiving both an M.B.A. and a J.D. in
1992. He feels that his law practice has allowed
him to be engaged in a higher level of business
more quickly than if he had he pursued a career
in business alone.
Born in Red Bank, New Jersey and raised in Akron,
Ohio, Ed is married to Tina. They have two sons,
Riley and Victor, and are expecting a third child
this October. He enjoys golfing, fishing and sailing.
Ed serves as a Trustee of the YMCA Endowment Board,
the Akron City Club, Child Guidance Centers, Family
Solutions and is an executive committee member of
Cascade Capital Corporation.
A Post-it note on Ed's office wall sums up his
attitude toward the practice of law: "Part
of the fun is to think of creative ways to excel
at client service."
Robert
A. Hager (Cleveland, Ohio) will present at a
Lorman Education Services seminar on August 9 in
Independence, Ohio. The topic is Construction
Lien Law for Attorneys In Ohio. To register
online visit the Lorman web site at www.lorman.com
Donald B. Leach,
Jr., Kenneth
A. Fisher, Jr., (Columbus, Ohio) Robert
A. Hager, and John
P. Slagter, (Cleveland, Ohio) will present in
two Lorman seminars on Design-Build Construction
Management in Ohio. The Cleveland seminar is on
September 19, 2001, and on September 27 in Columbus,
Ohio. For more information or to register online
visit the Lorman web site at www.lorman.com
On June 6, Donald
B. Leach, Jr., (Columbus, Ohio) presented to
the Builders Exchange of Central Ohio on Ohio's
Mechanics Lien Laws: Using the Laws to Your Advantage.
Don will make this presentation again for the Builder's
Exchange on December 4, 2001. For more information
or to register online visit the Builders Exchange
web site at www.bx.org
William
L. Caplan (Akron, Ohio) recently spoke on Environmental
Concerns For Developers at the National Business
Institute Seminar.
If you are interested in having a speaker from BDB
make a presentation to your organization, please
contact: Cheryl Warren, Director of Client Relations
and Marketing at 800.686.2825 ext. 546 or: cwarren@bdblaw.com
At BDB we are always improving our processes so
that we operate efficiently and effectively. Please
let us know how you like our new broadcast format.
E-mail: bdb@bdblaw.com
Phone: 330.258.6473 Fax: 330.252.5473.
Thank you.
|
Akron Boca Raton
Canton Cleveland Columbus
Naples
www.bdblaw.com
Toll-Free Numbers:
1.800.686.2825 – Ohio Offices
1.800.682.2825 – Boca Raton, Florida Office
1.800.782.2825 – Naples, Florida Office
|
|